|
|||||
![]() | |||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Home | |
Endnotes1 Like all historical classifications of ideas or schools of thought, this one also involves some arbitrariness. There is much overlap among the “generations” and at times, prescient anticipations of latter work. However, the categorization according to some prevalent general features during a particular period can still serve as a convenient marker or guidepost if we do not apply it in too rigid a manner. 2 See also Clautier et. als.(2002) for a review of the CGE literature on the impact of trade liberalization on welfare and poverty. Cororaton(2003) is a detailed study of the Philippine tariff reform using the CGE-Microsimulation approach. 3 There is, of course, the question of whether even the second generation of reforms will lead to the kind of sustained growth and poverty reduction that is anticipated. See for example, Hayami(2003) for questioning the view that growth and poverty reduction are sustainable. In particular, Hayami raises the issues of infrastructure building and other public investment projects that may still need to be undertaken by the public sector in order to make growth and poverty reduction sustainable. See also Naim(1994,2000,2002). 4 See Rodrik(2002), and Naim(2002,200,1994) 5 The document recognizes the link between growth and specific social expenditure categories and refers to some specific programs in three different countries. This type of analysis is clearly necessary, but may be too disaggregated for macromodels to address. However, much insight can be gained by such specific analyses alongside the standard multisectoral macro models. As the document points out:
See also ADB (2001; 2002a,b,c; 2003a,b) 6 See also, Agenor and Montiel(1999), Thorbecke and Morrison(1989), Khan(1983,1996,1997), Khan and Sogabe(1994), Khan and Sonko(1994) Khan and Thorbecke(1988), and Fields(2001). 7 Later in the case of the “dual-dual” approach to modelling, we will find basically the same classification scheme. However, the number of production sectors in the particular model discussed in section 7 is four. The reasons will be explained in section 7. 8 See Agenor, Pierre-Richard and Peter J. Montiel, Development Macroeconomics and the references there for evidence on the empirical importance of the costs of financing working capital in Argentina and the Republic of Korea respectively. If empirically relevant, the role of working capital in the short run supply curve would imply, for instance, that contractionary monetary policy may have short-term stagflationary consequences. 9 See for example, the papers collected in D. Mookherjee and D. Ray, Readings in the Theory of Economic Development, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2001, for a representative sample. See also, P. Bardhan and C. Udry. Development Microeconomics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, Hayami, Development Economics (1997) and Otsuka(2001,2000). 10 For a description of SAM as a data gathering device, see G. Pyatt and E. Thorbecke, Planning Techniques for a Better Future (Geneva:ILO, 1976). 11 In Walrasian general equilibrium models the flexible price vector determines the equilibrium. In a Keynesian (dis)equilibrium model in the short-run the quantities vary while the price vector remains fixed. 12 See Khan and Thorbecke, op.cit., Ch. III. The presentations here follow the cited work closely. 13 Actually, it is necessary and sufficient for all but one of the markets to be in equilibrium. As is well known, by “Walras’ law” when all but one markets clear, the last one must clear also. 14 Formally, the maximization of expected utility must be possible. For this, an axiomatic characterization was given by von Neumann and Morgenstern. A necessary condition is the possibility of expressing all states as quantifiable probability distributions. 15 For a succinct discussion of some of the relevant features of the applied models for policy analysis, see Yao, Shujie and Aying Liu, “Policy Analysis in a General Equilibrium Framework” Journal of Policy Modelling, 22(5): 589-610, 2000. 16 In macroeconomic terms, we can include the assumption of neutrality of money. And thus create a ‘classical’ model. 17 It should be noted, however, that the assumption of full employment means that the economy is at the wrong point of the (multidimensional) production possibilities frontier, not inside it. 18 See Armington(1969). 19 The theoretically inclined reader will recognize this as being in line with the Salter-Swan model. 20 Therefore, this is properly described as a comparative statics exercise with the chain of causality starting with the exogenous change in foreign savings and ending with a new trade balance. 21 See in particular, Bourguignon, F., J. de Melo, and A. Suwa, 1989. Distributional Effects of
Adjustment Policies: Simulations for Two Archetype Economies, Background Paper for
1990 WDR, World Bank. 22 See Decaluwé, Bernard, A. Patry, Luc Savard, and Erik Thorbecke, 1999. Poverty Analysis
within a General Equilibrium Framework. Working Paper No. 99-09, African Economic 23 See Azis, Iwan J. (2002), A New Approach to Modelling the Impacts of Financial Crises on Income Distribution and Poverty, Tokyo: ADBI Research Paper no. 35. 24 See also, Svejnar and Thorbecke(1982), Khan(1983,1985,1997). In these analyses, the particular country chosen was South Korea in the 1970s. Instead of CGE flex-price models, SAM-based models of fixed price variety were used. 25 See Khan (1997) chs. 2 and 3 for a historical survey and a specific intertemporal dualistic model which is used to analyze the conflict between employment and output. 26 Alternatively, one could also postulate that there is an 'insider' market wage equilibrium in the formal sector, and those unskilled workers lucky enough (or more likely, because they know someone already working in the formal sector) to get a job in the formal sector can enjoy this wage premium. This is not a hypothesis the authors consider, but the data will be consistent with this hypothesis as well. 27 The authors add in a footnote (footnote10) that this parameter "… permits a realistic (i.e. lower) calibration of the probability of getting a high paying job". 28 Salaries are excluded in equation 24. The reasoning is that these are invariant to exogenous shocks. 29 The nominal price of exports which is the numeraire remains constant. 30 The exact extent will naturally vary with the extent of relative price changes and the supply elasticities. 31 Stifel and Thorbecke(2003), p. 232. Download this Discussion Paper [ PDF 469.8KB| 73 pages ]. [previous chapter]
Comment(s)There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.
|
|
|||||
|
| ||
| Contact Us FAQs Sitemap Help | Terms of Use Privacy Policy | ||
| © 2012 Asian Development Bank Institute. | ||