Introduction
This paper explores the competitive threat posed by People's Republic of China (PRC) to
Latin America and Caribbean (LAC). It focuses on the impact of PRC's rise as a major
exporter of manufactures, but it also considers bilateral trade between LAC and PRC. We
explore these issues with trade data for 1990-2002 (2003 data are not available for all
relevant countries), analysing and comparing export performance and specialization patterns
in the world as a whole and in the US, the main market for both. We do not undertake a
detailed analysis of the competitiveness at the industrial or product level: this would require
detailed empirical investigation of the main export actors, benchmarking of productivity and
capabilities and comparisons of national costs and policies, well beyond our scope. Our
paper is thus a preliminary mapping that may offer insights for further, more detailed
exploration.
Section 2 discusses the notion of PRC's 'competitive threat' and out a schema for measuring
PRC's competitive impact in third markets. Section 3 analyses the 'potential for competition'
between LAC and PRC by comparing the structure of their exports in various ways. Section
4 assesses the competitive impact of PRC on LAC in world markets by comparing their
relative market share changes in both the world and US markets over 1990-2002 by
technology categories. Section 5 deals with bilateral trade between LAC and PRC. Section 6
concludes. The Appendix tables provide more detailed data.
Download this Discussion Paper [ PDF 365.5KB| 49 pages ].
Post a Comment | We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. |
Comment(s)
There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
|