Road Development and Poverty Reduction: The Case of Lao PDR
Lack of access to good road networks is a major constraint on the incomes and welfare of the poor. Quantifying the precise impact of this constraint is challenging.
Using recently available household expenditure survey data for Lao PDR this paper models the causes of poverty there and shows the impact on overall poverty levels of road improvements. As expected the impact is substantial: over 30% of rural households have no satisfactory road access. The paper is of interest not just for discussions on Lao PDR, but also for its methodology which can be applied elsewhere.
Download this Discussion Paper [ PDF 314.5KB| 42 pages ].
Post a CommentWe welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. Comment(s)
There are [1] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment. - Karel Martens
(posted 29 June 2007 / 05:44:52 PM)
It is important to note that roads will only alleviate poverty if it goes together with a transport service that is accessible for the poor. The expectation that roads alleviate poverty is based on the assumption that some form of para-transit will be available to travel with or without goods. In current circumstances, such services will most likely be provided by the market. However, as affluence increases, so will car ownership, and the same roads build to alleviate poverty, may become instruments to increase the gaps between those with and those without cars. it is therefore important to stress what is alleviating poverty: not the roads as such but the transport service it provides to the poor. By focusing on the transport service rather than roads the proper link between poverty alleviation and accessibility is made.
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
|