Change Font: A A A A Contact Us      What's New      FAQs      Sitemap      E-Notifications      Help      ADB.org home
Sharing development knowledge about Asia and the Pacific About ADBINews & EventsSpecial ProgramsPartnerships
Research Capacity Building & Training Publications
HomePublicationsCatalogPost-Tsunami Recovery: Issues and Challenges in Sri LankaReferences

References

ADB, JBIC and WB (2005), “Sri Lanka 2005 Post-Tsunami Recovery Program: Preliminary Damage and Needs Assessment”, January 2005.

Athukorala, Prema-Chandra and Budy P. Resosudarmo (forthcoming), “The Indian Ocean Tsunami: Economic Impact, Disaster Management and Lessons’, Asian Economic Papers.

Benson, Charlotte and Edward J. Clay (2004), Understanding the Economic and Financial Impacts of Natural Disasters, Disaster Risk Management Series No. 4, The World Bank, Washington D.C.

Cooray, S. (2005), “Donor Support, Pledges, Commitments and Expenditure”, Sri Lanka Development Forum: Background Papers.

Corden, W.M. (1984 ), “Booming Sector and Dutch Disease Economics: Survey and Consolidation”, Oxford Economic Papers, 36(2): 359-80

Corden, W. Max and Peter J. Neary (1982), “Booming Sectors and De-industrialisation in a Small Open Economy”, Economic Journal, 92 (825-48)

Cuny, Frederick C. (1983), Disasters and Development, New York: Oxford University Press

Dacy, Douglas C., and Howard Kunreuther. (1969), The Economics of Natural Disasters: Implications for Federal Policy, New York, NY; The Free Press.

Ebregt, Arthur and Pol De Greve (2000), Buffer Zones and their Management: Policy and Best Practices for terrestrial ecosystems in developing countries, National Reference System for Nature Management, International Agricultural Centre, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Freeman, Paul K., Michael Keen and Muthukumara Mani (2003), “ Dealing with Increasing Risk of Natural Disasters: Challenges and Options”, IMF Working Paper WP/03/197, IMF, Washington D.C.

GOSL (2005c), “Interim Report of the Auditor General on the Rehabilitation of the Losses and Damages Caused to Sri Lanka by the Tsunami”, September 2005.

GOSL (2005b), “Post Tsunami Recovery and Reconstruction Strategy”, May 2005.

GOSL (2005a), ‘Rebuilding Sri Lanka: Action Plan”, February 2005.

ILO (2005), “Livelihood and Employment Creation: Microfinance”, International Labour Organization, Geneva.

IPS (2005), “Tsunami: Policy Issues, Lessons and Challenges” in in Sri Lanka State of the Economy: 2005, Institute of Policy Studies, Colombo.

IPS (2005), “Listening to those who Lost: Survey and Analysis of Rebuilding and Relocation of Tsunami Affected Households in Sri Lanka”, August 2005.

IPS (2001), “Aid and Aid Under-Utilization“ in Sri Lanka State of the Economy: 2001, Institute of Policy Studies, Colombo.

Kunreuther, Howard, and Richard J. Roth Sr. (1998) Paying the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance against Natural Disasters in the United States, Washington, DC

Mathison, S.(2003), “Microfinance and Disaster Management”, Foundation for Development and Cooperation, Australia.

Sida, DFID and GTZ, 2005, Hambantota Verification Mission, 13-15 February.

Steele, P. (2005), “Phoenix from the Ashes? Economic Policy Challenges and Opportunities for Post-Tsunami Sri Lanka”, Working Paper No. 7, Institute of Policy Studies, Colombo.

TAFREN (2005), “Rebuilding Sri Lanka: Post-tsunami Reconstruction and Rehabilitation”, June 2005.

Download this Discussion Paper [ PDF 423.3KB| 53 pages ].




[previous chapter] [next chapter]


Post a Comment

We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting.

Comment(s)

There are [2] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.

  1. Dushi Weerakoon, one of the co-authors
    (posted 31 March 2006 / 11:43:50 AM)

    In response to the comment below:

    Besides funeral expenses, etc. a cash grant of $50 per month and $3.75 cash and food ration were given to all affected households (for approximately 4 months). For residents outside the buffer zone, if a house is more than 40% damaged, a grant of $2,500 is given in 4 instalments, based on progress. If a house is less than 40% damaged, then a grant of $1,000 is provided, disbursed in 2 stages. For residents within the buffer zone, the government planned to assist not only landowners, but all residents (including encroachers) with some form of housing. This was estimated to require around 50,000 permanent houses. Further quite considerable details on government handouts are contained in the report itself.
  2. ken bacon
    (posted 18 December 2005 / 06:57:36 PM)

    This chapter notes that the government immediately paid money for funeral expenses, livelihood and cooking utensils. What additional government compensation has been provided? I am particularly interested in how the relatively generous post earthquake compensation program in Pakistan compares to government compensation for loss following the tsunami.

The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.

Back to Top 
©1998-2008 Asian Development Bank Institute. All rights not expressly granted herein are reserved.