Conclusion
On top of improving the business environment, license downsizing has the
potential for changing bureaucrats’ behavior towards private businesses through
institutionalizing the operational mode of the administration on the basis of PRC’s WTO
commitments. The downsizing centers on removing the licensing authority of local
bureaucrats and changing the practice of creating market barriers and rent seeking by
the use of an overly complicated licensing system. The PRC government has slashed
most licensing items and issued laws and regulations to prevent annulled licensing items
from being re-established. Sub-provincial governments have to refer to national laws and
regulations before making decisions on licensing issues, and gain the approval from
provincial-level governments in order to establish new licenses. Provincial people’s
congresses have taken some of the licensing authority from provincial-level
governments and weakened the latter’s ability in licensing issues.
The selective implementation of the downsizing illustrates that the masterminds
behind the policy have failed to adequately consider the structural features of local
institutions through which the downsizing policy is carried out. Since the policy entails
numerous implementers whose interests are diverse and activities are poorly
coordinated, a command-and-control approach in implementing the policy neither solicits
voluntary compliance from implementers nor generates adequate information for
policymakers to monitor policy implementation and exercise sanctions. Besides that, the
incentive systems in local governance go against the policy in the implementation
process: The performance appraisal systems of local leaders and job rotation system
encourage local leaders to narrowly focus on the short-term economic growth of small
localities but ignore the welfare of wider regions and the long-term policy of improving
investment environment. Licensing authority conducive to achieving the immediate result
of economic growth by fending off competition against local enterprises and their
products is therefore much sought after. Since local governments are required - at least
to a large extent – to be financially self-sufficient, the potential of the licensing authority
to form local governments’ major source of revenue provides strong incentive for the
local government without a broad tax base to thwart license downsizing. Other
institutional features such as weak institutional positions of private businesses,
ineffective legislation review mechanism, and deficient legal system make it possible for
local leaders to bypass the formal rules.
Download this Discussion Paper [ PDF 266.9KB| 30 pages ].
Post a Comment | We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. |
Comment(s)
There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
|