Introduction
On 15 August 2004, Mongolia signed a Trade and Facilitation Agreement (TIFA) with the US, a
precursor to a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). Prior to this, Mongolia was the only country
that had not signed either a TIFA or BTA with another country, or joined a regional or plurilateral
trade agreement (PTA). Every country in the world today is a member of at least one PTA and
BTA, and most are members of multiple BTAs.
1 If PTAs were considered the main threat to the
world trading system in the 1990s, the concern has since shifted towards BTAs. BTAs have
been proliferating at an astounding pace recently.
What are the underlying factors driving the proliferation of BTAs? Why are Japan and Korea,
countries that had had long resisted the worldwide trend to join or form PTAs, now pursuing
BTAs with a vengeance? Can we explain why Singapore is currently negotiating a BTA with
Kuwait, or why Sri Lanka has signed one with Iran, or Taipei,China with Nicaragua, for that
matter? Indeed, what are the motivations behind the 176 BTAs currently being proposed,
negotiated or implemented involving at least one country from the Asia-Pacific region, or the
300 or so BTAs world-wide?
This paper attempts to provide an answer to these questions by providing a taxonomy of BTAs,
identifying the underlying motivations behind them in terms of both economic and non-economic
factors. Apart from trying to understand why BTAs have been proliferating, identifying the
factors driving them is important because they may reveal the impact that they are having on
the world trading system. Depending on why countries form BTAs, they could be working as
either building blocks or stumbling blocks in terms of a more integrated and successful
international economy.
The paper is in 5 parts. Section 2 provides some facts and figures relating to BTAs, including
their proliferation, to provide the backdrop for the ensuing analysis. Section 3 provides a
taxonomy of BTAs, identifying the different reasons that motivate countries to form them. The
impact that BTAs are having on multilateralism and the world trading system is the subject of
Section 4. A final section provides a summary of main points, and considers likely scenarios for
the future landscape of world trade, and possible responses.
Download this Discussion Paper [ PDF 180KB| 25 pages ].
Post a Comment | We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. |
Comment(s)
There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
|