Introduction
Regional trade agreements (RTAs) have proliferated since the 1990s, particularly after the
completion of the Uruguay Round. Nearly every country in the world now is either
participating in or discussing participation in one or more regional agreements. Such
agreements have been concluded among high-income countries, low-income countries and
more recently starting with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between
high-income and developing countries. The structure of regional agreements varies, but all
have one thing in common: the objective of reducing barriers to trade between member
countries. At their simplest they merely remove tariffs on intrabloc trade in goods, but many
go beyond that to cover non-tariff barriers and to extend liberalization to trade and
investment. On the whole, the newer agreements tend to have deeper coverage, extending
into areas of domestic disciplines beyond the exchange of tariff concessions. A number of
agreements now also cover the services sector.
With virtually all World Trade Organization (WTO) members being partners in at least one
RTA, these agreements have become by far the most important exception to the mostfavored
nation (MFN) principle. Moreover, as the number of RTAs multiplies, networks of
overlapping agreements may generate intricate webs of discriminatory treatment thereby
leading to complex regulatory structures for the conduct of a growing share of world trade.
The issue of regionalism vs. multilateralism has generated a vast debate on whether the
immediate consequences of regionalism for the economic welfare of the integrating partners
encourage or discourage evolution towards globally freer trade. However, most analysts,
including the WTO Secretariat, have concluded that on the whole, regional agreements have
made a positive contribution to the liberalization of world trade. Keeping in view the other
large number of important issues regarding transparency of WTO rules on RTAs, the Doha
Development Agenda (DDA) has included the issue of RTA as an area for negotiation in
para 29 of the Ministerial Declaration. WTO members agreed to negotiations aimed at
clarifying and improving disciplines and procedures under the existing WTO provisions
applicable to RTAs. They also agreed that the “negotiations shall take into account the
developmental aspects of RTAs.” The economic logic for this is that particularly for the
developing countries, the ability to adjust to greater competition in the domestic markets or
to take full advantage of additional market access opportunities can be constrained by their
individual level of development. This points to the need to examine the flexibilities available
during the transitional or implementation period of RTAs, taking into account the needs of
developing countries in a properly focused and appropriate manner so as to support their
greater integration into the multilateral trading system.
The basic objective of the present paper is to analyze the issues under the Doha
Development Agenda with regard to RTAs. Keeping in view this basic objective some of the
issues that come to the fore are highlighted in order to produce possible suggestions for
India’s interest. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 summarizes
the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)/WTO provisions on RTAs. Section 3
briefly discusses the global trend of RTAs and Section 4 focuses on the effect of the
emerging new regionalism on world trade. Section 5 identifies the RTA-related issues that
are of particular interest to India. Section 6 concludes the paper with trade policy
recommendations for developing countries.
Download this Discussion Paper [ PDF 313.9KB| 20 pages ].
Post a Comment | We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. |
Comment(s)
There are [1] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment. - Dr. Jayanta K. Nanda
(posted 04 July 2007 / 08:44:57 AM)
Not only for India, but for global trade in the near future.
-www.jknanda.com
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
|