Conclusion: Challenges Ahead
Economic regionalism is taking root in East Asia. The region is becoming highly integrated
through market-driven trade and FDI activities and, at the same time, FTAs are proliferating.
The paper has argued that consolidation of multiple and overlapping FTAs into a single East
Asian FTA can help mitigate the harmful "noodle bowl" effects of different ROOs and standards.
This move will encourage the participation of low-income countries in freer trade arrangements,
reduce trade-related business costs particularly for SMEs, and promote trade and investment.
The paper has also suggested that WTO-plus elements need to be further expanded and that
the consolidation at the ASEAN+6 level would yield the largest gains to East Asia among
plausible regional trade arrangements—while the losses to non-members are relatively small.
For such consolidation to occur, ASEAN must act as the regional "hub" by further deepening
ASEAN economic integration, the plus-three countries (PRC, Japan and Korea) need to
collaborate more closely, and India needs to pursue further structural reforms. Furthermore,
substantial international support is required to strengthen the supply-side capacity of poorer
ASEAN countries—including the building of trade-supporting infrastructure (transport, energy,
and telecommunications)—so that they can take advantage of integrated regional markets and
narrow development gaps within ASEAN.
Relationships with the US (and the EU) are important for the region. For many East Asian
economies, the US is the crucial ally from a security perspective, particularly given the
geopolitical concerns in the Korean Peninsula. APEC remains important for East Asia and the
US because it is the only multilateral economic forum that connects the US with East Asia. A
natural approach for East Asia is to strengthen economic ties with the US through the formation
of an East Asia-North America Free Trade Area FTA (or an APEC FTA). While several East
Asian countries have agreed on bilateral FTAs with the US, some have reservations about a
comprehensive agreement with the US. Deeper questions also remain as to whether the US is
ready to agree an FTA with East Asia—that includes the PRC—and whether the US trade
promotion authority (which expired in June 2007) will be extended.
Download this Discussion Paper [ PDF 404KB| 52 pages ].
Post a Comment | We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. |
Comment(s)
There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
|