The Cross-Market Premium
The cross-market premium is defined as the percentage difference between the dollar price
of the stock in the domestic market and the price of the corresponding depositary receipt
(DR). Depositary receipts (also known as American Depositary Receipts or ADRs) are
shares of non-U.S. corporations traded in the U.S. (and denominated in dollars), while the
underlying shares trade in the domestic market of the issuer. A depositary receipt represents
a specific number of underlying shares remaining on deposit in a so-called custodian bank in
the issuer’s home market. A new DR can be created by depositing the required number of
shares in the custodial account in the market. The dividends and other payments will be
converted by this bank into U.S. dollars and provided to the holders in the U.S. The process
can simply be reversed by canceling or redeeming the DR. In this way, an underlying stock
can easily be transformed into a DR and vice versa.
The cross-market premium (or discount) thus reflects the deviation between the home
market price of the stock and its price in New York. It can be computed by converting the
local currency price of the underlying stock in dollar prices, multiplying this by the number of
underlying shares one DR represents, and then dividing their value by the DR price. Or,
πt = StrPtund - Ptdr ÷ Ptdr
with πt representing the premium at time t, St the spot exchange rate expressed in U.S.
dollars per local currency, r the number of underlying stocks per unit of DR, Ptund the price of
the underlying stock in local currency, and Ptdr the price of the DR in New York in U.S. dollars.
When assets can be transferred freely between the domestic market and the U.S.,
transaction costs are negligible, and the two markets close at the same time, arbitrage
should be instantaneous and costless. If the return of the underlying stock is higher than the
return of the DR, investors can make an instant profit by buying the DR, transforming it into
the underlying stock and selling this stock. This will drive the price of the underlying stock
down and the premium back to zero. The reverse story holds when the return of the DR is
higher. In principle, the premium will be equal to zero. If a shock occurs too late during the
day to be arbitraged away, closing prices will differ, but this difference will disappear quickly
the next trading day.14
In reality, however, there is no instantaneous and costless arbitrage. If an investor decides to
transform underlying stocks into DRs and sell them in the U.S., he has to incur transaction
costs. These typically include a broker’s fee and a transaction fee to buy the underlying
stock and transform it into the DR, plus a second broker’s fee to sell the DR. Additional
transaction costs might be the cost of opening a bank account in the U.S. or a tax that needs
to be paid to transfer the funds back to the domestic market. A U.S. investor would face
similar transaction costs. Furthermore, since settlement in equity markets typically takes
place a number of days after the transaction, there is also a foreign exchange risk unless the
stock trade is matched with a forward exchange rate contract. These transaction costs
incurred include both fixed as well as variable costs. While the fixed costs can be dwarfed by
increasing the transaction size, the existence of variable costs can generate a “no-arbitrage
band” within which price deviations are not large enough to induce arbitrage. Higher
(variable) transaction costs induce the widening of the no-arbitrage band and, thus, weaker
integration.
Download this Discussion Paper [ PDF 755.8KB| 39 pages ].
Post a Comment | We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. |
Comment(s)
There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
|