Introduction
The twelve states1 that entered the European Union (EU) in 2004 achieved
considerable macroeconomic stabilization during the accession process. The Central
and Eastern European (CEE) countries among them went through the transition from
central planning to market economies, beginning with severe recessions, high inflation,
and financial instability. In due course, the inflation rates came down and nominal
interest rates declined. Public debt has been stabilized, though high and persistent
deficits and the need for further fiscal adjustments are still critical issues in several
cases.
In the years to come, the new EU member states will face two principal challenges in
formulating macroeconomic policies. The first is to manage the continued and likely
rapid process of further real economic convergence, which will come with high real
GDP and productivity growth rates and large capital inflows. The second is to achieve
the degree of nominal convergence required to enter into (the Third Stage of)
European Monetary Union (EMU). These two challenges are not unrelated, as rapid
growth and large capital inflows can make it more difficult to achieve nominal
convergence, although, as we have argued in a recent paper (von Hagen and
Traistaru-Siedschlag, 2006), there are good reasons to believe that real convergence
would be easier to manage for some of the countries at least, if they were allowed to
adopt the euro immediately. Both challenges relate mainly to fiscal policy: Managing
capital inflows, because fiscal policy can absorb part of their demand effects; and
nominal convergence, because the sustainability of public finances is part of the
requirement for entering EMU.
Lifting capital controls and restrictions on foreign currency trade was one of the
conditions these states had to meet to qualify for EU membership. Thus, the CEE
countries went from being largely closed to being largely open to international capital
flows. This paper discusses their experience with capital account liberalization and with
coping with large capital inflows. We begin in Section 2 with a discussion of basic
economic characteristics and the real convergence achieved so far. In Section 3, we
discuss the pace and sequencing of capital account liberalization and the degree of
international financial integration achieved so far. Given the different initial conditions
and economic characteristics of Cyprus and Malta, we focus on the CEE group.
Further, in Section 4 we analyze trends and patterns of capital inflows in these
countries in recent years. Some stylized facts are useful for understanding the
macroeconomic implications and policy challenges of coping with large capital inflows
discussed in Section 5. Finally we conclude in Section 6 with policy implications for
emerging Asian countries.
Download this Discussion Paper [ PDF 228.1KB| 42 pages ].
Post a CommentWe welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. Comment(s)
There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
|