Change Font: A A A A Contact Us      What's New      FAQs      Sitemap      E-Notifications      Help         Follow Us on Twitter   ADB.org home
HomePublicationsCatalogRice Contract Farming in Cambodia: Empowering Farmers to Move Beyond the Contract Toward Independence

Rice Contract Farming in Cambodia: Empowering Farmers to Move Beyond the Contract Toward Independence

Rice Contract Farming in Cambodia: Empowering Farmers to Move Beyond the Contract Toward Independence From the farmer's perspective, contract farming provides stable market access, credits, extension services, infrastructure and other benefits, but has drawbacks such as limiting the flexibility of farming and marketing. Based on a survey of rice contract farming for export in Cambodia, this paper uses simple mean comparison, propensity score matching comparison, and switching regression comparison to assess the impact of contract farming on farmers' performance. Farmers with larger family sizes, younger and more educated household heads, less asset value, and those with farm locations closer to the highway are more likely to join the contract. The results provide evidence that contract farming of non-certified organic rice has a positive impact on farmers' profitability. They also suggest that progressive farmers living near the highway tend to join the contract first, but leave contract farming early, while farmers in more remote areas remain under contract. It appears that the sample former-contract farmers' profitability did not decline after leaving contract farming as they further intensified their farming systems to produce for the less chemical conscious market. Thus, contract farming may be involved in the process of helping subsistence farmers develop into independent commercial farmers.

This study provides empirical evidence that contract farming of safe food in remote areas where land is less contaminated could be an effective private-sector led poverty reduction strategy. However, since contract farming in this case is not inclusive of the poorest farmers, public sector support is required to lower the transaction costs of working with them.

Download this Discussion Paper [ PDF 167.1KB| 31 pages ].




[next chapter]


Post a Comment

We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting.

Comment(s)

There are [1] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.

  1. Anthony M. Zola
    (posted 02 July 2008 / 12:54:22 AM)

    This is an excellent contribution to the current debate about contract farming in mainland Southeast Asia.

    I have conducted research for the ADB, much less sophisticated than this study, and had similar results. Smallholder farmers were better off if they were engaged in contract farming than when they sold daily labor to local concessions / nucleus estates.

    My congratulations to the research team. It is not an easy topic on which to conduct research.

    Anthony Zola
    Bangkok, Thailand
    & Vientiane, Lao PDR

The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.

Back to Top 
©1998-2010 Asian Development Bank Institute. All rights not expressly granted herein are reserved.