Regional Monetary Units for East Asia: Lessons from Europe
This paper reports the European experience with a basket currency, the ECU, and how those lessons may apply to the creation of an East Asian regional currency unit. In practice, it turned out that a basket currency entails considerable unexpected technical complexities. The technical particularities of a basket currency are discussed before turning to the criteria for determining the shares of participating currencies. In Europe three criteria were used for determining the weights of shares: GDP shares, international trade shares, and financial market indicators. In addition, weights will change with exchange rate movements. This may require a correction mechanism for political acceptability. From an economic viewpoint, weights depend critically on the purpose of the basket currency: is it a reference indicator, is it a currency for international transactions, or is it a parallel currency? Thus, before weights are discussed, a clear vision of the role of the basket currency is desirable. The vastly different growth performance among Asian economies also suggests a preference to forward- rather than backward-looking measures. Turning then to the different functions of a basket currency, we examine the use of basket currencies as a divergence indicator, or as a financial instrument, in regional financial markets before elaborating a road map for the development of a basket currency in Asia.
Download this Discussion Paper [ PDF 274.5KB| 38 pages ].
Post a Comment | We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. |
Comment(s)
There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
|