|
|||||
![]() | |||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Home | |
Capital Market Reform in Asia: 8th Round Table
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Participants' registration |
|
|
Opening Remarks ADBI: Peter McCawley, Dean, ADBI OECD: Carolyn Ervin, Director, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, OECD Professor Andrew Sheng, Chairman of the Round Table |
|
Session 1: Capital Market Reforms in Asia: Issues, Progress and Challenges |
|
|
|
Capital markets play an important role in mobilizing savings to finance production and infrastructure investment needed for economic development. In Asia, the savings ratio has been much higher than in other regions. However, such savings have not been adequately invested in Asia. Only five percent of Asian total cross-border portfolio investment has been directed to other East Asian markets, as compared to Europe where 63 percent of cross-border flows remain within the European region. This is partly due to the underdevelopment and inefficiencies of the capital markets in the Asian region. Various reforms have been made to: (i) improve corporate governance including investor protection; (ii) strengthen market regulations and supervision; (iii) expand investor base especially contractual savings, mutual funds, and cross-border funds; (iv) improve market infrastructure; and (v) develop new financial instruments. The session focuses on the current state of financial market integration in Asia, the progress on Asian capital market reform and development and issues and challenges ahead. How should Asia accelerate the pace of domestic market development and integration in order to make more efficient resource allocation within Asia? How could Asian economies (1) make better and strategic use of existing for a such as ASEAN + 3, EMEAP and APEC; (2) further engage with the private sector, and (3) utilize international institutions like IMF, World Bank, ADB and OECD. How could Asian economies better mobilize savings from surplus economies and finance much-needed infrastructure financing in other parts of Asia? Presentations:
|
|
Break |
|
|
Discussants:
|
|
|
|
Lunch Break |
Session 2: Financial Policy Landscape |
|
|
|
In 2005 the Round Table discussed various aspects of the formulation of financial policy against the backdrop of a rapidly changing financial services landscape. This year we will continue discussion by focusing on narrower topics of how financial policy has responded and should further respond to the internationalization of financial transactions. More specifically, this session will follow the discussion in Session 1 above by raising issues as to possible and desirable financial policy making in order to promote the market integration in Asia. If Asia is to aim to foster more common market place, what should the response of financial regulators be? Is it sufficient that we explore further regional co-operation among policy-makers and regulators, or should we explore some mechanisms for ensuring policy convergence in the region? Presentations:
|
|
|
Break |
|
|
Discussants:
|
|
|
Departure for dinner reception |
|
Session 3: Competition and Integration of Exchanges and its Implications for Regulators |
|
|
|
As recently witnessed in Europe and the US, one of the key challenges facing securities market regulators is the rapid development towards integration of major exchanges. Such integration takes various forms including consolidation of exchanges through mergers. While these developments contribute towards further enhancing market efficiency, they also pose serious problems and concerns to securities market regulators in terms of application of their rules and regulations as well as supervision. Following the discussion in Session 2, this session will discuss the extent to which Asian stock exchanges are emulating the experiences of their European and the US counterparts in this regard, should the consolidation of stock exchanges be encouraged in Asia and how securities market regulators should respond to the emergence of big exchanges operating across the jurisdictions. Presentations:
Discussants:
|
|
|
Break |
|
Session 4: Corporate Governance: Methodology for Assessment of the Implementation of the OECD Principles and Discussion of Progress |
|
|
|
Increasing importance has been attached to corporate governance for ensuring the integrity and efficiency of markets since the financial crisis in Asia in the late 90's and the corporate scandals in the US and Europe in the early 2000's. Following the revision of the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance in 2004, the OECD has developed an assessment methodology that will underpin its dialogue with member countries on the implementation of the Principles. As the Principles are one of the Twelve Key Standards for Sound Financial Systems adopted by the Financial Stability Forum (FSF), this Methodology is also expected to provide the basis for the assessments undertaken by the IMF/World Bank either in the form of a Report on the Observance of Standards and Code (ROSC) or as part of the Financial Sector Assessment Programme (FSAP). In this session, based on the presentation by the OECD focusing on its work on the Methodology, efforts for the improvement of corporate governance in this region will be reviewed particularly by focusing on implementation and enforcement and the future challenges will be discussed. Presentations:
Discussants:
|
|
Lunch |
|
Session 5: International Convergence of Accounting Standards |
|
|
With the rapid globalization of capital markets, the convergence of accounting standards has become a key issue to develop comparable and high quality framework of financial reporting. IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) has been expanding its scope of application in the recent years. Many countries are now either adopting or converging with IFRS. Norwalk Agreement in 2002 served as a wake up call for the convergence talk between the FASB(US Financial Accounting Standards Board) and the IASB(International Accounting Standards Board) followed by their renewed commitment, the Memorandum of Understanding in 2006. The ASBJ (Accounting Standards Board of Japan) also started the discussion with the IASB in 2005 and with the FASB in 2006. Based on the presentation of convergence progress and recent agenda of IASB, the current issues of convergence and regulator's perspective will be discussed. Presentations:
Discussants:
|
|
|
|
Closing Remarks |
| ||
| Event Details | ||
|
||
| Table of Contents | ||
| See Also | ||
| Related Links | ||
|
This link takes you outside the ADBI website. |
||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| ||
| Contact Us FAQs Sitemap Help | Terms of Use Privacy Policy | ||
| © 2012 Asian Development Bank Institute. | ||