Change Font: A A A A Contact Us What's New FAQs Subscribe ADB.org home
HomePublicationsCatalogUrban Governance for Poverty Reduction and Social Development: Tools, Techniques and Good PracticesSummary of Case Studies and Key Lessons

Summary of Case Studies and Key Lessons

4. The main lessons derived from case studies were summarized and commented on by central government officials, NGOs and training institutions. These discussions were followed by a presentation about knowledge management required when new and best practices are to be applied. The Forum concluded by establishing an “Asian Regional Knowledge Management Network”.

5. Over 30 case studies were submitted and some 20 discussed in the plenary session or during group sessions. Case studies were drawn from Bangladesh, Cambodia, PRC, India, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka and Viet Nam. All studies can be accessed at Asian Mayors’ Forum homepage on ADBI website a t www.adbi.org/ asiancities/ and also on ESCAP’s website under www.unescap.org

6. The case studies (i) first addressed the issue of how to improve living conditions in cities in particular of the poor and (ii) then discussed how to improve opportunities and access to municipal services for the poor in cities. The case studies on improving living conditions in the city for the poor focused on improving housing quality, reducing environmental degradation, reducing illness and improving health and improving mobility and affordable transport. Case studies on providing opportunities and access for the poor in the city focused on access to employment, income generating opportunities, access to urban services and community amenities, access to credit and providing skills training.

7. From the case studies a number of lessons and issues were identified that are common to many Asian cities:

(1) The importance of cities in national growth is generally underestimated and inadequately accounted for in city planning (for example the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Seoul exceeds the entire GDP of Indonesia)

(2) Cities occupy just 2 percent of the world’s land surface, but they use three quarters of the world’s resources and discharge a similar percentage of waste. A regional perspective in planning needs therefore to be taken

(3) Knowledge of urbanization processes and urban development remains scattered and fragmented

(4) Investments in infrastructure and industries need to take into account local implications and require coordination and linkage planning

(5) Policies to stimulate and regulate growth are ad hoc and ineffective in particular with regard to urban areas

(6) Urbanization and city development remains a low government priority

(7) Available information and the skill level required for urban development activities remain low. This also applies to coordination of activities among organizations involved

(8) Financial resources required to maintain and develop urban infrastructure and services remain insufficient. Morever, such financial resources are used unimaginatively

(9) The legal framework and institutional structure is generally inadequate, management systems are outdated and organizations ill equipped

(10) Most cities do not sufficiently address the poverty problem. The vibrant informal sector remains misunderstood and is often even neglected

(11) Existing rules and regulations are frequently unimaginative, restrictive, lead to unauthorized construction and breed corruption

(12) Efforts to involve and educate people and to raise their civic and environmental consciousness need to be enhanced. This should lead to stronger participation of the major stakeholders

(13) Positive as well as negative impacts of globalization on urban development are still not well understood

(14) With increasing natural disasters, most cities are ill prepared for disaster management

(15) Environmental pollution and degradation continues to worsen in most cities. Technologies to reverse this trend exist but are not applied

(16) The social aspects of urban living, stress, tension gender discrimination, marginalization, crime are not addressed adequately

(17) Ecological and social sustainability in Asian cities are endangered

NO. NAME OF CITY TITLE OF CASE STUDY
1. Rajshahi, Bangladesh Good Urban Governance for Poverty Reduction and Social Development
2. Phnom Penh, Cambodia Women’s Economic & Legal Rights Program
3. Phnom Penh, Cambodia Community Participation in Urban Development Process
4. Changchun, China Address of Mr. Zhang Anshun, Mayor of Changchun
5. Nanchang, China City, Population, Aid-the-poor Program
6. Shenyang, China Strengthening Environmental Governance
7. Taiyuan, China Historic Cultural Values and the Development of a Modern Educational Industry in an Ancient City
8. Administrative Centre for China’s Agenda 21 Regional Development and Poverty Alleviation in China
9. Chennai, India Urban Governance—Sustainable Chennai Project
10. Udupi, India Brief Note on Udupi City Municipality
11. Bogor, Indonesia Poverty Alleviation through Good Governance Management
12. Pondok Perasi, City of Mataram / Lombok Indonesia Urban Quality Programme
13. Vientiane, Lao PDR Vientiane Municipal Women’s Union’s City Consultation on Gender and Urban Poverty Reduction
14. Penang, Malaysia Participatory Decision-Making Process in Urban Governance: A Narration of SERI’s Experiences and Approaches
15. Birendranagar, Nepal Moving Towards Urban Good Governance and Poverty Reduction
16. Lodhran, Pakistan Lodhran Pilot Project (LPP)—Case Study and Manual for Urban Sanitation
17. Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines Urban Environmental Governance Through SCP-EPM Process
18. Makassar, Philippines The Dealing with of Social Community Problems in Makassar City
19. Mandaluyong, Philippines The Mandaluyong—Pasig River Resettlement and Rehabilitation Project
20. Manila, Philippines The Role of the League of Cities of the Philippines in Promoting Good Urban Governance
21. Muntinlupa, Philippines Adopt a School Program
22. Naga, Philippines Putting Power in the Hands of Our People
23. Pasig City, Philippines Bayanihang Paluwagan Sa Pasig (Mutual Help Micro Finance in Pasig)
24. City of San Fernando, Pampanga, Philippines Case Study
25. Sri Lanka National Replication Strategy: Sustainable Sri Lankan Cities Programme
26. Colombo, Sri Lanka Green Star Home Project
27. Colombo, Sri Lanka Achievements through Benchmarking and Continuous Improvement in Solid Waste Management in the Undeserved Settlements
28. Dehiwala Mt. Lavinia, Sri Lanka A Demonstration Project on Community Based Waste Recycling Project in Partnership with the Municipality and other Partners, Dehiwala Mt. Lavinia Municipal Council Area (DMMC), Sri Lanka
29. Kotte, Sri Lanka A Demonstration Project on Generation of Bio-Gas Using Market Waste
30. Hai Duong, Viet Nam Strengthening Public-Private Partnerships to Promote and Create Urban Employment
31. Vinh City, Viet Nam The Road to Good Urban Governance for a Balanced Sustainable Urban Development

8. From the lessons learned and issues outlined, it emerged that good governance is central for urban development and poverty reduction. Good governance in this context includes (i) a progressive perspective which is a function of good leadership which local authorities must provide, (ii) functional partnerships which are vehicles that enable cities to tap community resources and (iii) participation to ensure long-term sustainability by generating broad-based stakeholder and community ownership over local undertakings.

9. Another requirement considered necessary for good urban development in support of poverty reduction and social development was the solid and wellfunded autonomy of local authorities.

10. Case studies also revealed the importance of accountability of governments and politicians for their actions. Accountability therefore requires governments to engage with its constituents—especially with those who are marginalized and poor. It was noted that the process of engaging communities in the formulation and implementation of public policy and development programs has evolved significantly over the several decades. There has been a four-step evolution of processes to involve communities and other stakeholders:

  1. Consultation which involves telling communities what governments intend to do to implement certain policies and projects
  2. Participation which involves asking communities and other stakeholders what they want and taking their views into consideration in the formulation of policies and projects
  3. Engagement which allows communities and civil society to make limited decisions about matters that affect local or national interests and become involved in the implementation of projects under the umbrella of governments
  4. Co-governance which devolves functions and powers of governments to communities and businesses to take actions on behalf of government

11. It was noted that most societies have reached step (2) of the above process. Some of the case studies showed that certain cities are already involved in step (3) and reported positive experiences with engaging communities.





[previous chapter]

Back to Top 
© 2012 Asian Development Bank Institute.