|
|||||
![]() | |||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Home | |
Distinguished Speakers Seminars
Professor Spence noted that 12 (now revised to 13 with the addition of Brazil) economies have achieved sustained high growth, showing 7% or more for 25 years or more. There is a wider range of countries that have experienced recent growth accelerations. The jury, however, is still out on whether these more recent growth accelerations can be transformed into sustainable growth dynamics. These economies have different starting points, growth patterns, and drivers of growth, but they appear to have common elements that sustained their growth momentum. These include leveraging the global economy; market incentives and decentralization; high levels of savings and public and private investment; resource mobility; stable and functional investment environment; political leadership and effective, pragmatic, and (when needed) activist government; and pragmatism and willingness to experiment. For countries that have sustained high growth, the transition period from low to high income is shorter (see Figure). Growth Dynamics: Transitions in Years as a Function of the Growth Rate
Professor Spence pointed out that the government should be pragmatic and should not be guided by dogma. The role of the government evolves over time as the economy matures, expands its capabilities, and integrates into the global economy. The government must provide leadership and vision, adopt effective communication strategies, and build consensus. Finally, Professor Spence noted some global trends such as rising income inequality and resistance to globalization; impacts of global warming on developing countries; global implications of the growth of the People's Republic of China and India; demographics, aging, and migration; and global governance, imbalances, and the rising influence and impact of developing countries that pose the challenge of policy coordination with new important players. These trends need to be given more attention by key world leaders. Read a more detailed summary of Professor Spence's seminar.
Dr. Mahani argued that the emergence of new economic powers in Asia can be based on population size. Aside from providing large markets for products and services, countries with rapidly increasing populations can attract investment, and they therefore have the potential to become centers for production. However, demographic characteristics can be a strength or a burden to a country, so managing demographic factors is an essential strategy. Read a more detailed summary of Dr. Mahani's seminar.
He indicated that in the short-run, food aid is needed to respond to the current food crisis. However, Noland suggested that the long-run solution to North Korea's chronic food problems was for the country to open up externally and export manufactured goods, mining products, and other goods. He emphasized that a permanent solution to the North Korean food crisis and its economic revival would continue to depend on future diplomatic developments. Read a more detailed summary of Marcus Noland's seminar.
Dr. Chalongphob takes the view that because both research and policy are multi-dimensional and complex, the bridging is necessarily complex. Thus, how to make best use of the policy research and bridging capacities already available in developing countries will be the biggest future challenge, rather than simply concentrating on building more policy research and bridging capacities. Read a more detailed summary of Dr. Chalongphob's seminar. [previous chapter] [next chapter]
|
|
||
|
| ||
| Contact Us FAQs Sitemap Help | Terms of Use Privacy Policy | ||
| © 2012 Asian Development Bank Institute. | ||