Large Re-exports and Illicit Trade
Trade statistics have long been unavailable from the Afghan authorities
since 1992-93. According to an external ad-hoc survey, Afghanistan’s total
trade in 2000 was $2.5 billion, comprising about $1.2 billion in imports and
about $1.3 billion in exports. Pakistan has been the top trading partner,
followed by Iran and other neighboring countries. According to a statement
made by the Pakistani foreign minister in July 2004, the official trade
between Afghanistan and Pakistan could reach $1 billion in 2004. However,
about 90 percent of the estimated total exports could comprise re-exports,
implying that indigenous exports falling significantly short of financing
imports. Customs data are believed to cover only two-thirds of total imports
and only a fraction of exports because of smuggling. The official figures do not include an estimate of opium exports, which was estimated to be in the
order of $2.5 billion in 2002/03. When compared with Afghanistan’s own
non-opium exports, opium exports are the overwhelming source of export
revenues generated with domestic resources. According to the statement
made by UNODC in June 2004, Afghanistan was responsible for threequarters
of the world's illegal opium supply and for a 5 percent increase in
the world supply and its production is expected to increase toward 2005.
Non-opium exports consist primarily of carpets, dried fruits, nuts,
sheepskins and precious stones while its imports, excluding those for reexport,
consist mainly of food items, fuel, transport and agricultural
equipment. The re-exports consist of electronics, cosmetics, toiletries,
crockery, auto parts, etc. Most of the re-exported goods find their way to
Pakistan. It is likely that the opening up of the economy will cause imports
to increase more rapidly in the short run.
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
Post a Comment | We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. |
Comment(s)
There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.
|