Introduction
Capital inflows provide emerging market economies with
invaluable benefits in pursuing economic development and
growth by enabling them to finance investment, smooth
consumption, diversify risks, and expand economic
opportunities. However, large capital inflows, if not managed
properly, can expose capital-recipient countries to at least three
types of risks (Kawai and Takagi, 2008). The first is
macroeconomic risk. Capital inflows could accelerate the growth
of domestic credit, create economic overheating including
inflation, and cause the real exchange rate to appreciate, thus
affecting macroeconomic performance in a way not consistent or
compatible with domestic policy objectives such as sustainable
economic growth with price stability. The second is risk of
financial instability. Capital inflows could create maturity and
currency mismatches in the balance sheets of private sector
debtors (particularly banks and corporations), push up equity
and other asset prices, and potentially reduce the quality of
assets, thereby contributing to greater financial fragility. The
third is risk of capital flow reversal. Capital inflows could stop suddenly or even reverse themselves within a short period,
resulting in depleted reserves or sharp currency depreciation.
About 15% of the large capital inflow episodes over the past 20
years ended in crisis, with emerging Asia experiencing
proportionately more episodes of hard landings (Schadler, 2008).
The most devastating of these episodes occurred in 1997–98.
This stresses the point that emerging Asian economies need to
manage these risks well so that they can enjoy the benefits of
capital inflows.
The nine emerging Asian economies included in this study1 have
posted remarkable growth rates since 2000, with the People's
Republic of China (PRC), Viet Nam, and India showing the
fastest growth rates. The International Monetary Fund (2007a)
identified India, Pakistan, Thailand, and Viet Nam as Asian
countries that were experiencing capital inflow episodes in the
late summer of 2007. In contrast to the years before the crisis,
all economies in the region except Viet Nam and India have
experienced current account surpluses. One unhealthy
development is the dramatic fall in investment ratios of crisisaffected
economies after the Asian financial crisis, and there is
no clear sign yet that the ratios will return to their pre-crisis
levels in some countries. In contrast, the investment ratios of the
PRC, India, and Viet Nam have risen and exceeded those of the
crisis-affected economies in recent years.
Despite sizeable current account surpluses, many emerging
Asian economies have received significant private capital
inflows.2 This has led to the accumulation of massive foreign
exchange reserves in these economies. It is to be noted that
capital inflows have considerably slowed in the past few quarters
due to the deepening of the United States (US) subprime loan
crisis and the uncertainty it has brought to the global financial
market. US financial institutions in particular have become
cautious about extending loans and investment, domestically
and internationally, in order to protect their balance sheets and
capital bases. While realizing losses on their impaired assets,
several major banks are trying to recapitalize through private
sources. This is the factor behind the ongoing credit crunch in
the US. However, once US financial stability is restored,
financial institutions rebuild the capital base, and the credit
crunch eases, capital inflows to Asia will likely resume and in a
big way, posing serious policy challenges, including for
macroeconomic management, exchange rate policy, and financial
sector supervision. Emerging Asian economies must therefore be
prepared to deal with another surge in capital inflows, even
though the region as a whole is likely to maintain a surplus in
its current account. Now is the time for emerging Asian
economies to put in place measures to manage risks arising from
such future surges.
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
Post a Comment | We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. |
Comment(s)
There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.
|