Conclusions
The fast-growing Asian region and its potentially enormous economic power raise the hope
that its own growing demand may help it both weather the adverse consequences of a US
slowdown and ease the impact of a global downturn. At the same time, trade is growing, and
growing lighter; exports are expanding primarily by reaching new markets with smaller
shipments; and fragmented production networks are becoming the norm. All of these
changes put a premium on speed, flexibility, and information, increasing the potential for the
transmission of shocks between trading partners.
Much intra-Asian trade is conducted by multinational corporations and their affiliates in the
form of intra-firm and intra-industry trade that involves fragmentation of production. The
production networks in Asia respond to demand from consumers outside the region rather
than being independent of them. Therefore, the G3 economies are still an important source
of external demand for Asia, and the region remains vulnerable to shocks from major trading
partners. Analysis of business cycle comovements, both within Asia and between the G3
and Asia, and examination of production fragmentation structures generally affirms the
linkage between growth in the G3 and Asia.
There is clear evidence pointing to increasing business cycle comovements among Asian
economies, particularly between the PRC and the rest of Asia. But there is no mutual
exclusivity between intra- and inter-regional economic integration—it is not one or the other.
In fact, deepening regional integration appears to reinforce Asia's integration into the world
economy. For this reason, Asia remains exposed to cyclical downturns in other regions.
In recent years, there has been little or no evidence that Asia has decoupled from G3
business cycles. In the post-crisis period, strengthening regional ties appear to reinforce
business cycle comovements between Asia and the G3, despite the fact that intra-regional
trade and financial linkages have, in general, risen more rapidly than extra-regional ones.
Underlying this regional interdependence is the structure of rising intra-Asian trade, which is
centered on the PRC as a production platform. At the center of multinational corporation
regional supply networks, the PRC is important in boosting both intra- and inter-regional
trade. But this central role has deepened economic interdependence between the PRC and
the rest of Asia as well as between the PRC and the G3.
An important task for future research is to assess the robustness of these observations using
detailed data on production sharing, including arms-length transactions, and with more
information on the extent of substitutability between production processes and inputs from
alternative sources. Greater analysis of the extent to which shock transmission occurs
asymmetrically between import and export channels may also help to enhance our
understanding of how Asian trade affects global linkages.
Download this Paper [ PDF 287.6KB| 40 pages ].
Post a Comment | We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. |
Comment(s)
There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
|