Introduction
The international economy is now well into the nearly yearlong financial crisis that has been
extraordinary in its persistence, its global reach, and the questions it has raised about the
workings of the financial system. In past episodes of systemic stress—such as the Asian
financial crisis of 1997 or the market turmoil associated with the failure of Long-Term Capital
Management in 1998—which have occurred from time to time in many economies over the
years, the policy questions in the aftermath have tended to center around such issues as
how to encourage more responsible behavior among borrowers and how to resolve bad-debt
problems more effectively. While these questions have rightly been asked in the context of
the current crisis, there have also been more fundamental questions about the financial
system itself that need to be addressed.
To understand the crisis, financial authorities have had to look very closely at such questions
as how credit has been intermediated, how losses are propagated, and how market liquidity
is generated and lost. To address the problems, authorities have had to ask what information
should be available about borrowers and instruments, how regulation can most effectively
prevent unnecessary disruptions to the functioning of the system without stifling innovation,
and how central banks should act in their capacity as lenders of last resort.
In this paper, we focus on the turmoil itself and the short- and medium-term policy responses
it has elicited. First, we describe the chain of events that constituted the crisis, discuss the
underlying causes, and draw lessons from the events. In characterizing the crisis, we
distinguish among the elements that are new, those that have remained the same, and those
that we do not understand. Second, we examine the policy responses thus far, both in terms
of efforts by central banks to stabilize markets in the short term and efforts by financial
authorities to strengthen the underpinnings of the system over the longer term. We end by
emphasizing the importance of recognizing the issue of procyclicality.
Download this Paper [ PDF 182.4KB| 18 pages ].
Post a Comment | We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. |
Comment(s)
There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
|