Introduction
This paper assesses the condition and outlook of the financial sectors—in particular, the
banking sector—in the East Asia region in the aftermath of the current global financial crisis.
First, I analyze risks in the banking systems using the standard supervisory framework,
which assesses capital adequacy, asset quality, management, earnings, and liquidity
(CAMEL). I find that banking systems in the region are sound, but that the short-term outlook
is negative. Second, I review the measures introduced in Asian countries to support the
banking systems. As in the United States (US) and Europe, Asian governments have
introduced various measures since mid-2008 to support their banking systems. In some
cases, they have offered critical fiscal support to stem the slowing of their economies. The
main bank support measures—direct capital support, removal and guarantees of bad assets,
direct liquidity support, and guarantees for banks' existing or newly issued obligations—
might be necessary to ensure stability, but they need to be handled carefully to prevent longterm
distortions. It remains to be seen whether Asian policymakers will manage skillfully the
lifting of supports. Third, I conduct stress tests of the banking systems. The stress tests
indicate that the largest banking systems in East Asia have almost US$1.2 trillion in Tier 1
capital and a possible shortfall of US$758 billion. Fourth, I assess the implication for liquidity
of the increase in international banking flows and find that the banking system in the
Republic of Korea (hereafter Korea) appears vulnerable to a reversal of capital flows. Fifth, I
explore the implications of the crisis for credit formation, assessing whether nonbank
financial institutions in the region have the capacity to provide sufficient liquidity. I conclude
that they do not. The paper ends with a brief assessment of the impact of the crisis on the
corporate sector, concluding that the effects of the crisis are likely to be significant but
manageable.
Download this Paper [ PDF 129KB| 27 pages ].
Post a Comment | We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. |
Comment(s)
There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
|