Change Font: A A A A Contact Us What's New FAQs Subscribe ADB.org home
HomePublicationsCatalogGlobal Production Networks and the People's Republic of China's Processing TradeEndnotes

Endnotes

1This exercise cannot be conducted with regular trade data because imports are not necessarily used as inputs in the production of exports, but can also be consumed locally.

2In this paper, “province” encompasses all of the PRC’s first-tier administrative divisions: provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions. We have excluded the Xizang Autonomous Region (also known as Tibet Autonomous Region) and Ningxia from our analysis because they had no processing trade in at least one year of our data sample. Furthermore, we treat Hong Kong, China; Macau, China; and Taipei,China as foreign economies.

3The sample correlation coefficient of –0.3274 is statistically significant at the 10% level. Note that the data used for this figure are adjusted for transshipments through Hong Kong, China. See Section 3 for further details.

4Yeaple (2003) uses the term “complex integration strategy.”

5The structure of our model closely follows that of Helpman, Melitz, and Yeaple (2004).

6We conduct our analysis for a single industry, but it is straightforward to embed our model in a general equilibrium framework with many industries.

7As is well known, where ni is the number (measure) of varieties available in economy i and pt(v) is the price of variety v.

8A debate has recently emerged on whether trade costs are truly a linear function of distance (e.g., Brun et al. 2005; Coe, Subramanian, and Tamirisa 2007). In this paper, we follow the standard approach in gravity regressions of using distance as a proxy for trade costs.

9We rely on this specific functional form because it ensures that the derivation is symmetric for advanced economies East and West. The key theoretical predictions of our model do not hinge on this specific functional form.

10As will become clear below, assumption 1 ensures that the unit cost of a type-P firm is sufficiently lower than that of a type-X firm so that aix > aip.

11(t2w)ε-1 > 1 implies that the unit cost of conducting both production stages at home for domestic sales is lower than offshoring final assembly to the PRC for re-import. While this assumption is not realistic, it significantly reduces the complexity of our analysis. Furthermore, relaxing this assumption is unlikely to change the two key theoretical predictions of our model.

12This graphical approach of presenting the results is adopted from Helpman, Melitz, and Yeaple (2004).

13This estimate of the import content share of the PRC’s processing exports is slightly lower than that of Koopman, Wang, and Wei (2008) because they also took into account indirect import content in their estimation.

14A positive coefficient on lnWage is in line with previous studies. Using data from 1996 to 1999 to examine the effect of labor costs on FDI location, Gao (2002) also obtained a positive coefficient on the OLS estimation of real wages.

Download this Paper [ PDF 340.3KB| 28 pages ].




[previous chapter]


Post a Comment

We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting.

Comment(s)

There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.

    The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.

    Back to Top 
    © 2012 Asian Development Bank Institute.