Conclusions
The economic and financial crisis has prompted a massive fiscal response that will
significantly change the global fiscal landscape for many years to come. As the world
economy hopefully moves out of the recession several issues will be relevant for
policymakers. First, it remains to be seen to what extent the fiscal stimulus packages will be
able to produce an impact beyond short-term support to demand and generate a positive
impact on long-term growth, i.e., obtain a double dividend. This is particularly relevant as the
recession will, most likely, hurt potential output on a global scale. Second, it remains unclear
as to when, to what extent, and with what speed the stimulus will have to be withdrawn to
make room for fiscal consolidation. Third, the size of the fiscal stimulus and the consequent
debt accumulation will make fiscal sustainability in several countries much more problematic
and may increase, at least in some cases, the temptation to inflate debt away. Fourth, it
remains to be seen to what extent the cooperative approach to fiscal policy that has been
seen since immediately after the crisis will persist as we move into a new phase.
The response to the crisis has been unprecedented in terms of resources and in terms of
coordination among policymakers. Hopefully the response will prevent a deeper recession
and return the world to a path of positive growth. For this to occur, the policy momentum
should not be interrupted. The new economic landscape calls for the definition of a new
global policy framework that should be based on three pillars: (i) an integrated approach
targeted at reinforcing and possibly raising potential growth by better connecting
macroeconomic, structural, and regulatory policies, (ii) strong institutional frameworks to
ensure fiscal sustainability, and (iii) enhanced international cooperation in the formulation
and implementation of macroeconomic, structural, and regulatory policies targeted at
preventing unsustainable payment imbalances from developing. The implementation of such
a framework will need to take into account structural as well as institutional differences
among countries and regions.
Download this Paper [ PDF 296.4KB| 23 pages ].
Post a Comment | We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting. |
Comment(s)
There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.
|
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.
|
|