Change Font: A A A A Contact Us What's New FAQs Subscribe ADB.org home
HomePublicationsCatalogAccelerating Regional Integration: Issues at the BorderTrade Facilitation and Location of Foreign Direct Investment

Trade Facilitation and Location of Foreign Direct Investment

Amiti and Javorcik (2008) found that access to markets and access to suppliers are the most important factors affecting entry decisions by foreign investors. The influence of market and supplier access on FDI location decisions was four times greater than that of production costs. Trade, investment, and production patterns in production chains are also partly determined by agglomeration and dispersion effects across countries and commodities. Kimura, Takahashi, and Hayakawa (2007) found that geographical distance reduces trade in machinery parts and components much less in East Asia than in Europe. This implies that the service link costs associated with international production fragmentation are substantially lower in East Asia than in Europe, contributing to large differences in the development of international production and distribution networks.

Trade facilitation has an indirect impact on FDI inflows by lowering the cost of spreading production across several countries in order to take advantage of their comparative advantages. Increased FDI, in turn, can further boost regional trade, adding to the direct effect of improvements in trade facilitation across borders. If the advantages of scattering production across economies in a region outweigh those from concentrating it together, trade facilitation makes FDI complementary to trade. For instance, in Southeast Asia's electronics industry, where components are generally small and light (relative to value added) with relatively lower transport costs, cross-border production networks proliferated in the 1990s. This can create a virtuous cycle of trade facilitation, trade, and investment that fosters increased trade and economic growth.

To compete for larger shares of regional supply chains, countries have striven to improve their trade services. In Malaysia, for instance, the government has actively promoted infrastructure development in order to strengthen its competitive and comparative advantage. Since the mid-1980s, Malaysia has pursued an FDI-led, export-oriented development strategy, with FDI contributing to the economy's integration in global production networks. Malaysia has enhanced its geographical attractiveness to foreign firms as a key link in global supply chains through infrastructure development and the resulting high-quality production and trade services.

Download this Paper [ PDF 293.2KB| 30 pages ].




[previous chapter] [next chapter]


Post a Comment

We welcome your feedback on this publication. Post a comment. ADBI is not obliged to acknowledge or publish comments and may abridge or edit them before web posting.

Comment(s)

There are [0] comment(s) for this entry. Post a comment.

    The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.

    Back to Top 
    © 2012 Asian Development Bank Institute.